Funding for climate protection projects in the municipal environment
The municipal guideline is administered by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) in Germany. It supports municipalities in implementing climate protection measures and contributes to the achievement of climate targets.
Funding is available for a wide range of projects and measures in the areas of energy efficiency, renewable energies, mobility, building refurbishment and other climate-related issues. Local authorities can receive financial support from the KRL to implement innovative projects and contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Feasibility studies play a decisive role within the framework of the KRL in order to assess and promote the feasibility and efficiency of climate protection projects in municipal contexts. They help to ensure that investments can be used in a targeted and sustainable manner to advance climate targets at local level.
Feasibility studies in the field of wastewater management
Feasibility studies in the field of wastewater management are used to make informed decisions on how municipal resources can be used effectively to promote climate protection and at the same time improve the quality of wastewater disposal. They ensure that investments are targeted and offer both environmental and economic benefits.
Ablauf einer Machbarkeitsstudie
The process of such a study usually follows a structured procedure comprising various phases. The following is a typical sequence of steps that are taken into account when conducting such a study
Project definition
First, the objectives of the feasibility study are clearly defined. This includes determining the scope of the study, the technical options to be investigated and the expected results. For example, the aim could be to examine the feasibility of an energy-efficient conversion of an existing wastewater treatment plant.
Analysis of the initial situation
A detailed analysis of the current situation is carried out. This includes an inventory of the existing wastewater infrastructure, the technical equipment of the wastewater treatment plant, the operating data and the previous environmental balance (e.g. energy consumption, CO2 emissions).
Potential analysis according to DWA-A 216
DWA-A 216 specifies the framework conditions for carrying out a potential analysis. The evaluation of operating data makes it possible to classify the energy consumption of the most important process stages of a wastewater treatment plant and to determine potential energy savings.
Technical options
Various technical solutions and options for achieving the defined goals are being evaluated. This could include testing different treatment processes, technologies for generating energy from wastewater or for reducing greenhouse gases.
Economic evaluation
A cost-benefit analysis is carried out to assess the financial impact of the proposed options. Investment costs, operating costs, possible savings and potential revenues from the recovery of recyclable materials are taken into account. Funding opportunities from KRL will also be examined.
Risk assessment and action plan
Potential risks and challenges that could be associated with the implementation of the proposed options are identified. An action plan is developed to minimize these risks and ensure successful implementation.
Preparation of the study
The results of the feasibility study are documented in a detailed report. This includes a summary of the options analyzed, key findings, recommendations for decision makers and possible next steps.
Decision and implementation
Based on the results of the feasibility study, the decision-makers make an informed decision on the implementation of the proposed measures. This may include applying for further funding from KRL or other funding sources.
Energy saving of the WWTP Zweibrücken
In 2016, the Zweibrücken wastewater treatment plant (70,000 population equivalents, PE) was examined in terms of its wastewater treatment performance and energy efficiency as part of a potential study. Based on this evaluation, potential savings were identified and various optimization measures were derived. The majority of these measures were implemented in the period from 2017 to 2019, demonstrably reducing energy requirements significantly and increasing the self-generation rate.
An important part of the action plan was the process engineering conversion of the biological stage and the optimization and renewal of the aeration system. In addition, the combined heat and power plant (CHP) and other units were replaced and equipped with performance measurements in order to be able to track energy consumption and the efficiency of the measures.
As a result of these measures, energy consumption was reduced from 1,719,278 kWh/a (2015/2016) to 1,167,284 kWh/a (2018/2019). The specific energy requirement fell from 29.2 kWh/EW∙a to 16.9 kWh/EW∙a. In addition, the proportion of in-house generation was increased from 46.1% to around 80%.
Extensive experience - Our references
Kunde | Kläranlage |
Stadt Andernach | KA Andernach (98.450 EW) |
VG Rüdesheim | KA Ellerbachtal (8.000 EW) KA Gräfenbachtal (8.000/20.466 EW) KA Schlossböckelheim (8.000 EW) |
VG Offenbach an der Queich | KA Hochstadt (10.300/23.000 EW) KA Offenbach (12.000 EW) |
VG Hauenstein | KA Hermersbergerhof (300 EW) KA Hofstätten (700 EW) KA Luger Tal (2.100 EW) KA Queichtal (9.000 EW) KA Wieslauter (4.000 EW |
Natur- & Geopark Mellerdall, Lux | KA Echternach (36.000 EW) |
VG Dahlem | KA Dahlem (4.700 EW) |
VG Betzdorf-Gebhardshain | KA Nauroth KA Friesenhagen-Steeg KA Wallmenroth |
VG Bitburger Land | KA Bettingen (2.000EW) KA Dudeldorf (3.660EW) KA Enzen (300EW) KA Fließem (1.200EW) KA Hüttingen a.d. Kyll (1.200EW) KA Idesheim (550EW) KA Meckel (530EW) KA Messerich (3.045EW) KA Nattenheim (3.280EW) KA Oberweis (4.700EW) KA Rittersdorf (2.100EW) KA Röhl (600EW) KA Sülm (1.200EW) KA Wiersdorf (2.800EW) KA Badem (2.300EW) KA Burbach (1.300EW) KA Malberg (7.200EW) KA Neidenbach (1.700EW) KA Oberkail (1.620EW) KA Pickließem (1.300EW) |
AV Lauter-Wetter | KA Ober-Bessingen (25.800 EW) |
UBZZ Zweibrücken | KA Zweibrücken (70.000 EW) |
VG Ulmen | KA Bad Bertrich (2.700 EW) KA Gevenich-Büchel (2.200 EW) KA Gillenbeuren (500 EW) KA Lutzerath (3.500 EW) KA Schmitt (3.800 EW) KA Urschmitt (700 EW) KA Wagenhausen (100 EW) KA Weiler (400 EW) KA Wollmerath (400 EW) |
VG Ruwer | KA Ruwertal (32.500 EW) |
VG Maifeld | KA Nothbachtal (35.000 EW) KA Ochtendung (9.000 EW) KA Ruitsch-Kerben-Minkelfeld (1.000 EW) KA Wallerbachtal (1.500 EW) KA Metternich (500 EW) |
Stadtwerke Büdingen | KA Büdingen (25.000 EW) |
AV Seemenbach | KA Rinderbügen (4.000 EW) |
AV Ohm-Seenbach | KA Nieder-Ohmen |
AV Limburg | KA Limburg (68.000 EW) |
VG Römerberg-Dudenhofen | KA Römerberg (10.352 EW) |
VG Südeifel | KA Karlshausen KA Kruchten (1.600 EW) KA Neuerburg (4.300 EW) KA Weidingen (430 EW) |
Stadt Warburg | KA Daseburg (12.000 EW) KA Warburg |
VG Winnweiler | KA Winnweiler (24.000 EW) |
Der Beitrag wurde verfasst von Jonas Nebeler.